February 22nd, 2012
You KNOW SOPA PIPA ?
are you agree with SOPA & PIPA? why?
if you not agree with SOPA & PIPA. why?
comment here.. =D
Just another Students.uii.ac.id Blogs weblog
are you agree with SOPA & PIPA? why?
if you not agree with SOPA & PIPA. why?
comment here.. =D
it’s me. icome from INDONESIA.
My FACEBOOK
do you know INDONESIA??
This blog has served its purpose — to work through preliminary ideas on IT literacy.
I used it to prepare a few talks and an article on the topic, and, more important, have started teaching an IT literacy course and creating its electronic text.
The electronic text is implemented using two, interlinked blogs as databases. One holds the course teaching modules, the second holds the corresponding assignments.
As such, I will stop posting on this blog. Future entries on this topic will be posted on my blog on Internet applications, implications and technology.
We cover the importance of precise conversational writing on the Internet, suggesting practices like careful reading of other’s messages, responding to specific requests, meeting commitments one makes, and quoting previous messages when necessary to retain context.
To illustrate these principles, I have posted two examples of ineffective conversational Internet writing. They areexample 1 and example 2.
Can you find places in these examples where each of the above practices was ignored?
Writing short documents is one of our Internet content creation skills. Twitter posts are an extreme form of short document, and they are unique to the Internet (well … perhaps fortune cookies too).
By spending a couple of minutes on a Twitter post, one can get two or three points across. My posts have gotten longer, approaching the 140 character limit over time.
A recent FCC survey found that only 20% of home Internet users know their download speed.
Last semester, I used Twitter and a wiki to illustrate collaborative writing and the writing of short documents in a Network News assignment. The student response was positive, so I will repeat the experience.
I started a class Twitter stream for links to current events relevant to our class, and told the students to follow the feed. I posted about 125 items during the semester.
The writing assignment was near the end of the term. Each student selected a particularly interesting post, and summarized it and its relevance to the class in a short document. Once the summary documents were polished, the students added them to a wiki page, creating a collaboratively authored Network News report for the term.
After the term, I asked the students to complete a short questionnaire on these assignments. Thirty three students responded. A summary of their responses follows.
They checked the class Twitter feed an average of 2.4 times a week and, on the average, followed the links in a tweet to learn more 3.2 times during the term. However, ten of the 33 students admitted they checked the feed less than once per week. Dropping them, the averages increased to 3.4 and 3.8. (We have a heterogeneous student body, and I run the class primarily for the benefit of the involved students).
I also asked whether they agreed or disagreed with this statement:
I found several of the articles interesting and useful - I am glad we had the Twitter stream for our class.
Overall, 23 students agreed with this statement. That fell to 19 (in parenthesis) when I ignored the ten who reported checking the feed less than once per week.
The next question was: will you continue following the Twitter feed after the class ends, and their responses were:
I also asked for comments, criticisms or suggestions on the use of Twitter in class, and the replies were:
I also asked for feedback on the writing of the short document. We had covered several “tips” during the class, and I asked which ones they used for this assignment. The number who used each tip is shown below:
The 2009 Educause Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology is out.
The study reports on the technology students use, how it affects their learning experience and their preferences in IT courses. This year’s study held focus groups at 4 schools and surveyed 30,616 freshmen and seniors at 103 four-year institutions and 12 two-year institutions. (Longitudinal comparisons dating back to 2006 are available from only 39 institutions).
A few of their findings about students this year were:
As shown below, this activity keeps them online (doing school work and recreation) an average of 21.3 and a median of 16 hours per week.

(Click the image to enlarge it).
For comparison, Nielson reported that the average American television viewer watched more than 148 hours per month during the second quarter of 2009.
The Nielsen report cited above reveals that television viewing is not falling as Internet usage rises — where do people find the extra time? If you are a student, how do you compare with those in this study?
I just posted a note on an online survey on writing that was completed during spring 2009 by children between 9 and 16 in England and Scotland. The post listed some of the statistical findings.
During the spring 2008, the Pew Research Center conducted a more scientific telephone survey on Writing, Technology and Teens. Some of their findings are listed below.
The methodologies were different, but they covered many of the same issues.
If you are a student, what are your answers to the questions these surveys asked? If you are a teacher, how might these statistics influence your curriculum?
Langkah 1 : Kumpulkan file-file anda yang ingin di sembunyikan dan compress jadi satu dengan menggunakan Winrar. Misalkan beri nama filerahasia.rar .
Langkah 2 : Siapkan sebuah file gambar (.jpg). Misalkan beri nama gambar.jpg .
Langkah 3 : Letakkan kedua file tersebut ( File gambar.jpg dan filerahasia.rar )dalam sebuah directory yang sama. misalkan Drive c:
Langkah 4 : Buka command prompt dan ketikkan : c:>copy /b gambar.jpg+filerahasia.rar hasil.jpg
Langkah 5 : Setelah itu akan tercipta sebuah file baru dengan nama hasil.jpg. Coba anda buka file hasil.jpg. Sekilas tidak akan ada bedanya dengan file gambar.jpg milik anda kecuali ukuran filenya yang bertambah besar. Anda tetap bisa membuka file tersebut dengan Picture Editor atau Image Viewer anda. Tidak ada tanda-tanda bahwa sebenarnya ada sebuah file rahasia didalamnya.
Langkah 6 : Bagaimana cara membuka file rahasia anda? Klik kanan pada file hasil.jpg lalu pilihlah [Open With] –> [Choose Program..]. Pilihlah WinRar lalu klik [OK]. Anda akan bisa melihat file rahasia anda dan bisa mengextract seperti biasanya.
visit my other site
it’s about tips and trick how to manage our computer
Elemen Basis Data
CHECK IT OUT
The Language List
Collected Information On About 2500 Computer Languages, Past and Present.
Maintained by Bill Kinnersley
Welcome to The Language List! Early versions of this list were posted to comp.lang.misc beginning in 1991. Now a web site, our intention remains the same — to become one of the most complete sources of information on computer programming languages ever assembled (or compiled :-).
The list does not pretend to be a definitive scholarly work. Its purpose is to collect and provide timely information in a rapidly growing field. Its accuracy and completeness depend to a great extent on the users of the Internet. If you know about a language that should be added, please share your knowledge.
| Contents of an Entry | What Languages Should be Included |
| Language Categories | Dialects, Variants, Versions and Implementations |
| References | A Chronology of Influential Languages |